To the Football Association, 30th March 2020
We are writing to express our profound concern and displeasure regarding the decision to null and void entirely the 2019/20 playing season from steps three to six of the men’s non-league, as well as tiers three to seven of the women’s non-league.
Our concern is grounded primarily in the needless and inexplicable haste exercised in reaching the decision, coupled with a total lack of substantive dialogue or consultation with affected clubs. The decision also disregards the millions of pounds invested and countless hours expended collectively by clubs, and so has critical financial implications.
In writing this joint letter, we recognise that the decision to expunge results for the 2019-20 season still pends official ratification from the FA Council. However, we believe it is unacceptable that such a decision has been handed down to us in this manner. We urgently seek constructive dialogue with the FA with the aim to have the decision reconsidered.
Before continuing, it is crucial that we extend our appreciation to all governing bodies, leagues and respective chairpersons for their continued hard work at a time of such adversity. We are markedly conscious of the seriousness of the public health situation, which undoubtedly takes precedence over football. Consequently, all clubs agree with the decision that the current playing season should be indefinitely discontinued until it is safe to resume; it would be both irresponsible and reckless to consider resuming playing football at this time.
We would like to take the opportunity to echo government advice for everyone to stay at home to protect the NHS, and thus save lives.
Over the last few days, we the clubs have reached consensus in our views regarding the manner in which the decision to both terminate, then expunge the current playing season has been delivered, seeking to clearly express them below:
Why was the FA decision reached so hastily when there is plenty of time ahead in the coming weeks and months that can be utilised to sensibly consult with leagues and clubs?
The official FA statement online states that: “The FA and National League System (NLS) steps three to six have reached a consensus that their 2019-20 season will now be brought to an end, and all results will be expunged”. No such consensus was ever reached among the NLS steps three to six, and some leagues were barely consulted.
Affected clubs were eager to open an official consultation process with their respective leagues and the FA, to work on an agreed and constructive outcome. Many leagues across the country assert that no vote had been put to them by the FA, and that leagues at steps five to six in particular felt the decision had already been made by the time they had been consulted, rendering the ‘consultation’ process insignificant. Many clubs were never given an opportunity to vote, only to suggest possible conclusions to league officials. There appears to have been little-to-no attempt to consult deeply and widely and so formulate a clearer idea of what any ‘consensus’ among clubs might be.
On a similar note, leagues and clubs at step seven of the non-league pyramid were not consulted whatsoever in the decision, in spite of the fact that the ruling affects clubs in step 7 as well.
NLS steps one to two are not in the same “null and void” decision – it is understood they were removed from the ruling at the 11th hour. How can the FA possibly justify treating different steps under the non-league banner differently? Particularly given there now is the possibility of relegation from step two but no promotion from step three? It is incomprehensible to treat leagues differently; you cannot undermine the integrity of the footballing pyramid by applying a different set of rules to one group and not to the others.
Voiding the season has immense financial implications on clubs, their sponsors and local communities. Why did the FA, in reaching its decision, not discuss the huge financial impact during their ‘consultation’ process? Are clubs expected to foot the bill for playing a season of ‘friendlies’?
Whilst we are deeply dissatisfied with the manner in which the decision has been reached and delivered, it is imperative to consider the ramifications of the decision itself on clubs, from a footballing, financial and community perspective.
Most clubs in steps three to six have now completed 70-80% of their league fixtures, and it is incomprehensible that these results should be delegitimised and expunged on the basis that the final quarter of the season cannot be fulfilled in the future. Simply put, there is no valid basis to expunge an entire season, especially at this stage.
We are led to believe that the option of the “extension of the playing season” was discounted because of the issue of player contracts and wages becoming a problem for clubs; we ask only that the same logic be applied to our leagues that is being applied in the rest of the NLS and the EFL. Where necessary (many of the clubs in question do not have such player salary concerns) we can work with the FA to develop a solution that helps the clubs, whether that’s leveraging the government subsidies on offer or liaising with players to be flexible with the clubs they represent. This is far from unfeasible.
Clubs including Jersey Bulls FC and Vauxhall Motors FC have also already mathematically secured promotion this season – what are the grounds for them not to get promoted this season? Especially when they have clearly outgrown their respective competition? Other clubs also stand on the verge of promotion. It is patently unjust to have a season’s tireless work annulled in such a manner.
The issue, however, goes far beyond those clubs expecting promotion. Many clubs backing this letter do not currently stand to get promoted yet still offer their support because of their belief in upholding the integrity of the footballing leagues. Our demand for the FA to reconsider its decision is also about sending a message to the fans of our clubs, who have spent hard-earned money to follow their teams up and down the country, letting them know their support was not in vain. We know it is well within the powers of the FA to ensure that this is the case.
Despite the declaration to have our seasons expunged from record, the FA remains open to completing many other competitions under its jurisdiction, including the FA Trophy and FA Vase. The FA Trophy presents a particularly interesting case where one semi-final pits step three Halesowen Town FC against step two Concord Rangers FC. How can one club have their season expunged yet compete in the same season against a club who may fulfil their season entirely? The issue of unequal treatment across tiers also pertains to the women’s footballing system, whereby clubs in tiers one and two have not had their seasons expunged, unlike clubs from tiers three to seven.
The decision to null and void the season is also at odds with the FA’s Strategic Plan, which includes a commitment to boosting participation in women’s football and to achieve ‘trusted regulation and efficient administration’. The move to entirely expunge the 2019/20 playing season undoubtedly risks jeopardising further participation in football across the board as a whole, as many may feel disenfranchised with the sport altogether – a potential direct consequence of the FA’s decision.
Furthermore, The FA cannot disregard the potential mental health impact on those involved in the running of non-league teams affected by the decision. Football plays a monumental role in the lives of so many people, young and old, and the footballing authorities have rightly started to acknowledge this on a national scale. So we question whether this aspect has been considered when rushing out a decision as important and drastic as this.
The consensus that we have reached is to take a similar stance to what the Premier League aims to do – wait several weeks to see how the public health situation unfolds before deciding next steps. This is sensible in circumstances where it is by no means certain that we will even be able to start next season in a timely fashion. Among the options for serious consideration should be deciding final positions on a Points Per Game (PPG) basis, which unlike expunging the season, is rooted in the results of fair and meritocratic competition, and bears reflection of the hard work that clubs across the country have poured in this season.
The FA has already used a PPG basis to decide final standings before, and many teams under the league re-structuring plans would stand to get promoted on the application of PPG.
A crisis like this is a watershed moment for the FA and the relationship it chooses to have with non-league and grassroots football. It is imperative to solve this issue sensibly and democratically over the coming weeks, with transparent, constructive and fair dialogue with respective leagues and clubs. The alternative which would certainly not reflect well on the FA, is forcing clubs to embark on potential legal recourse, which is wholly unnecessary and financially burdening to clubs. However, we reserve all our rights in this respect and this letter is without prejudice to any legal arguments which may become required to be made in due course.
We urge the FA to reconsider its decision and to slow down the whole process, offering proper consultation with afflicted leagues and clubs as the picture becomes clearer, before deciding a way forward. We stand ready to play our full part to help achieve a fair outcome, allowing the integrity of England’s football pyramid to be upheld in such a period of national adversity.
Geoff Thompson – Chairman, South Shields FC
David Dent – Chairman, Shildon AFC
Sartej Tucker – Walton & Hersham FC
Paul Tudor – Wolverhampton Casuals FC
Peter Palmer – Beckenham Town FC
Martin Hillerby – Chairman, Stockton Town FC
Spencer Carmichael-Brown – Hashtag United FC
Kev Fryett – Redcar Athletic FC
Ian Horswell – Chairman, Jersey Bulls FC
Guillem Balague – Biggleswade United FC
Alan Smith – Chairman, Studley FC
Mark Brough – Leek Town FC
Barry Hunter – Chairman, Worthing FC
Ted Ilderton – West Allotment Celtic FC
Billy Wood – CEO, Hastings United FC
Richard Giles – Chairman, Ilkley Town AFC
Kai Arter – Chairman, Otley Town FC
Andrew Morris – Westfields FC
Marcus Gree – Coventry United FC
Mark Wear – Stourbridge Ladies
Andy Pountney – Stourbridge FC
Steve Richardson – Chairman, 1874 Northwich FC
Bob Andrew – Chairman, Tamworth FC
Karen Brookes – Halesowen Town FC
Steve Taylor – Chairman, Lancing FC
Vince Kirkup – Chairman, Crook Town AFC
John Lowe – Farnham Town
Chris Stirrup – Chairman, AFC Liverpool
Robert Houghton – Gateshead Leam Rangers
Stuart Turner – Chairman, Quorn FC
Dan Birchmore – Secretary, Ascot United
Paul Thompson – Chairman, Barnsley WFC
John Manship – Chairman, Melton Town
Rajinder Gill – Chairman, Sporting Khalsa
Mike Tranter – Chairman, Shifnal Town
Jim Davies – Lower Breck FC
Mick Sloane – Chairman, Shepshed Dynamo
Andrew Boyd – AFC Basildon Women
Bryan White – Workington AFC
Ku Akeredolu – Chairman, Leicester Road FC
Dave Ferrier – Chairman, Dudley Town FC
Duane James – Mulbarton Wanderers
Andy Marshall – Chairman, Dinnington Town FC
Martin Marlborough – Chairman, Colney Heath FC
Andy Perkins – Walthamstow FC
Dave Keegan – Campion AFC
Inanç Elitok – Chairman, Ware FC
Stevie Carter – Ryton & Crawcrook Albion FC
Chris Lax – Wolviston FC
Colin Beat – Birtley Town FC
Anthony Golden – Sunderland West End FC
Richard Kane – Chairman, Gainsborough Trinity FC
Stuart Fitchie – Chairman, Herne Bay FC
Sue Billings – Corinthian FC
Ash Berry – Shelley Community FC
Jack Richards – Truro City FC
Mike Tranter – Shifnal Town Ladies
Ed Garty – Maldon & Tiptree FC
Peter Clewer – Uttoxeter Town FC
Justin Hodgin – Chairman, Walsall Wood FC
Neil Sharp – Chairman, Stowmarket Town FC
Joe Doran – Bootle FC
Graham Read – Aylesbury United FC
Tony Woodley – Vauxhall Motors FC
John Wonfor – Selby Town FC
Darren Attwood – Liversedge FC